<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama the Never-Ending Campaigner</title>
	<atom:link href="http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:03:56 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RHM</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2250</link>
		<dc:creator>RHM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 23:48:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2250</guid>
		<description>http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1108/Duprey_Schmidt_deny_Newsweek_report.html

And Greta van Susteren asked Steve Schmidt about the now infamous towel incident reported by Newsweek.

Schmidt’s response: “Never happened.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1108/Duprey_Schmidt_deny_Newsweek_report.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.politico.com/blogs/michaelcalderone/1108/Duprey_Schmidt_deny_Newsweek_report.html</a></p>
<p>And Greta van Susteren asked Steve Schmidt about the now infamous towel incident reported by Newsweek.</p>
<p>Schmidt’s response: “Never happened.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RGVgal</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2248</link>
		<dc:creator>RGVgal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2248</guid>
		<description>If the stuff coming out about Palin&#039;s lack of knowledge about &quot;the major policy issues of the last 10 yrs&quot; is true, McCain and his entire campaign owe the American people an apology for repeatedly lying to us and pretending like they put &quot;Country First&quot;. I think the campaign advisors are doing more damage to McCain than Palin by leaking all this because this reflects very poorly on his judgement.

Those on the right that are still high on the Palin kool-aid, need to take a look at the exit polls. She doesn&#039;t appeal to moderates and if they keep insisting that she is the future of the GOP, they will be in the minority for many yrs. 

Over at Slate they are having a very good discussion about the future of the GOP that is worth reading.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If the stuff coming out about Palin&#8217;s lack of knowledge about &#8220;the major policy issues of the last 10 yrs&#8221; is true, McCain and his entire campaign owe the American people an apology for repeatedly lying to us and pretending like they put &#8220;Country First&#8221;. I think the campaign advisors are doing more damage to McCain than Palin by leaking all this because this reflects very poorly on his judgement.</p>
<p>Those on the right that are still high on the Palin kool-aid, need to take a look at the exit polls. She doesn&#8217;t appeal to moderates and if they keep insisting that she is the future of the GOP, they will be in the minority for many yrs. </p>
<p>Over at Slate they are having a very good discussion about the future of the GOP that is worth reading.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dickmill</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2247</link>
		<dc:creator>dickmill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2247</guid>
		<description>Things for the GOP to think about going forward -- here&#039;s one of the most important:

THe Right owns talk radio. They&#039;re putting a lot of effort now into whining about the Fairness Doctrine. WRONG! Forget about fighting over the radio!

The largest talk radio audience is Rush Limbaugh -- 2-3 million per day. Add to that all the others and you might reach 5-6 million. AND...you can only listen when they happen to be broadcasting, e.g. Rush 1-3 PM in Boston, unless you take the trouble to listen to a recording (which I doubt happens a lot.) You&#039;re also largely in your car when you listen (people watch TV more than listen to radios at home -- do many even HAVE radios now at home?)

So...while the GOP big-wigs are trying to defend their radio turf, the vast majority of real people are either watching TV or...ON THE INTERNET!

Who owns the grassroots on the internet? The Democrats. Look at fundraising; look at recruitment; look at the age demographics; etc.;etc.;etc.

Like any other war, is you can keep the enemy pinned down and defending territory you don&#039;t value very much, you&#039;re free to pillage the good stuff. George W. doesn&#039;t really know much about the &quot;internets&quot;, and congressmen have shown even less knowledge than Palin displayed on world geography.

There are 1.3 BILLION emailers in the world. In the US, nearly 75% of our 300 million+ population have access to the internet. Messages can become viral in less than a day. Fundraising and collections the same. (The day following the election I received several Obama emails asking for more donations for &quot;the cause.&quot;)

Memo to GOP: Now that the voters have essentially thrown the bums out (you!), you&#039;d better get with the 21st century. You&#039;re riding down the pot-holed, traffic-jammed interstate on the burned-out hulk of the confused-talk-express BUS -- and the Dems are working from home on the internet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Things for the GOP to think about going forward &#8212; here&#8217;s one of the most important:</p>
<p>THe Right owns talk radio. They&#8217;re putting a lot of effort now into whining about the Fairness Doctrine. WRONG! Forget about fighting over the radio!</p>
<p>The largest talk radio audience is Rush Limbaugh &#8212; 2-3 million per day. Add to that all the others and you might reach 5-6 million. AND&#8230;you can only listen when they happen to be broadcasting, e.g. Rush 1-3 PM in Boston, unless you take the trouble to listen to a recording (which I doubt happens a lot.) You&#8217;re also largely in your car when you listen (people watch TV more than listen to radios at home &#8212; do many even HAVE radios now at home?)</p>
<p>So&#8230;while the GOP big-wigs are trying to defend their radio turf, the vast majority of real people are either watching TV or&#8230;ON THE INTERNET!</p>
<p>Who owns the grassroots on the internet? The Democrats. Look at fundraising; look at recruitment; look at the age demographics; etc.;etc.;etc.</p>
<p>Like any other war, is you can keep the enemy pinned down and defending territory you don&#8217;t value very much, you&#8217;re free to pillage the good stuff. George W. doesn&#8217;t really know much about the &#8220;internets&#8221;, and congressmen have shown even less knowledge than Palin displayed on world geography.</p>
<p>There are 1.3 BILLION emailers in the world. In the US, nearly 75% of our 300 million+ population have access to the internet. Messages can become viral in less than a day. Fundraising and collections the same. (The day following the election I received several Obama emails asking for more donations for &#8220;the cause.&#8221;)</p>
<p>Memo to GOP: Now that the voters have essentially thrown the bums out (you!), you&#8217;d better get with the 21st century. You&#8217;re riding down the pot-holed, traffic-jammed interstate on the burned-out hulk of the confused-talk-express BUS &#8212; and the Dems are working from home on the internet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank the Tank</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2246</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank the Tank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2246</guid>
		<description>@Pinkie

I&#039;d say it&#039;s even money that she replaces Ted Stevens as Senator.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Pinkie</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say it&#8217;s even money that she replaces Ted Stevens as Senator.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pinkie</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2245</link>
		<dc:creator>Pinkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:40:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2245</guid>
		<description>I want to start this off saying that I didn&#039;t vote for McCain/Palin.  It seems like this shit coming out about her is sour grapes.  So what if she was taking a shower in a hotel room and came out in a towel.  What does that have to do with anything?  And the reports by ther staffers seem more like the blame game because of a lost election than anything substantial.  I mean, if Palin is really that stupid, she should never have been selected for VP or removed from the position when they realized it.  Keeping her on the ballot in such a case was being dishonest with the american people.

It just sounds like staffers are trying to make excuses for McCain&#039;s loss of the election.  There are enough reports out there that Palin was restricted in what she could say and the campaign was pissed that she wouldn&#039;t stick to the talking points.  She was a wreck in interviews because the staffers caged her in.  Take a look at her ineterview with Glenn Beck in march (i think) on youtube to get a better sense of what this woman is really like.

Another angle to these reports is that the good-ole-boy establishment of the GOP and the MSM are threatened by this woman portraying real change in our government.  She went in and really reformed Alaska to an extent, for better or worse.  She got rid of corrupt officials in the Republican party at home.  She faced down the oil companies and won.  That sort of real change is scary to those she might take it away from.

It will be interesting to see Palin in a couple of years when she is not being held back by a campaign.  I think she will surprise a lot of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want to start this off saying that I didn&#8217;t vote for McCain/Palin.  It seems like this shit coming out about her is sour grapes.  So what if she was taking a shower in a hotel room and came out in a towel.  What does that have to do with anything?  And the reports by ther staffers seem more like the blame game because of a lost election than anything substantial.  I mean, if Palin is really that stupid, she should never have been selected for VP or removed from the position when they realized it.  Keeping her on the ballot in such a case was being dishonest with the american people.</p>
<p>It just sounds like staffers are trying to make excuses for McCain&#8217;s loss of the election.  There are enough reports out there that Palin was restricted in what she could say and the campaign was pissed that she wouldn&#8217;t stick to the talking points.  She was a wreck in interviews because the staffers caged her in.  Take a look at her ineterview with Glenn Beck in march (i think) on youtube to get a better sense of what this woman is really like.</p>
<p>Another angle to these reports is that the good-ole-boy establishment of the GOP and the MSM are threatened by this woman portraying real change in our government.  She went in and really reformed Alaska to an extent, for better or worse.  She got rid of corrupt officials in the Republican party at home.  She faced down the oil companies and won.  That sort of real change is scary to those she might take it away from.</p>
<p>It will be interesting to see Palin in a couple of years when she is not being held back by a campaign.  I think she will surprise a lot of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Williams</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2243</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2243</guid>
		<description>Ouch - the truth hurts.  

Yes, the Libertarian Party ticket failed on number of levels.  So it is entirely possible the radical wingnuts - marginalized by Barr&#039;s nomination - will regain favor and screw things up beyond repair in 2010 and 2012.  But I don&#039;t think so.

I met nearly every state LP chair and found most to be reasonable individuals, doing their best to placate the base while reaching out to moderate voters.  We do have a message that resonates with most Americans, it is just that we&#039;ve never had a messenger with the right personality and people skills to sell it.

Like you say, RHM, lots of things can happen and voters do have short memories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch &#8211; the truth hurts.  </p>
<p>Yes, the Libertarian Party ticket failed on number of levels.  So it is entirely possible the radical wingnuts &#8211; marginalized by Barr&#8217;s nomination &#8211; will regain favor and screw things up beyond repair in 2010 and 2012.  But I don&#8217;t think so.</p>
<p>I met nearly every state LP chair and found most to be reasonable individuals, doing their best to placate the base while reaching out to moderate voters.  We do have a message that resonates with most Americans, it is just that we&#8217;ve never had a messenger with the right personality and people skills to sell it.</p>
<p>Like you say, RHM, lots of things can happen and voters do have short memories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JAC</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2242</link>
		<dc:creator>JAC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 15:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2242</guid>
		<description>As usual, great blog Randall!I completely agree with your comments about the short term memories of voters, as well as newly registered voters that did not experience fist hand what happened this time around.  I also think that another problem that might surface at the 2012 election is that many people expect change fast and will judge Obama as a failure and vote him out if his changes haven&#039;t taken effect right away, even though the next president would probably benefit from the changes he implements!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, great blog Randall!I completely agree with your comments about the short term memories of voters, as well as newly registered voters that did not experience fist hand what happened this time around.  I also think that another problem that might surface at the 2012 election is that many people expect change fast and will judge Obama as a failure and vote him out if his changes haven&#8217;t taken effect right away, even though the next president would probably benefit from the changes he implements!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank the Tank</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2241</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank the Tank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 14:47:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2241</guid>
		<description>@Dickmill

You must be in Massachusetts smoking................</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dickmill</p>
<p>You must be in Massachusetts smoking&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RHM</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2240</link>
		<dc:creator>RHM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:39:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2240</guid>
		<description>@ dickmill,

I don&#039;t think so. Lots of things can happen and voters have short memories. I hope they regroup and rebuild their party to the point where people like me would consider voting for them again. But that may be wishful thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ dickmill,</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think so. Lots of things can happen and voters have short memories. I hope they regroup and rebuild their party to the point where people like me would consider voting for them again. But that may be wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dickmill</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>dickmill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>Republican nominee for 2012? Sorry...I think the GOP should just vote &quot;present&quot; and wait for 2016. For one thing, they should maximize their resources in taking back the congress. And for another, it&#039;ll take them 8 years to just begin that process.

My prediction: the Republicans MIGHT have a president again in 2024. They&#039;ve done that much damage...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Republican nominee for 2012? Sorry&#8230;I think the GOP should just vote &#8220;present&#8221; and wait for 2016. For one thing, they should maximize their resources in taking back the congress. And for another, it&#8217;ll take them 8 years to just begin that process.</p>
<p>My prediction: the Republicans MIGHT have a president again in 2024. They&#8217;ve done that much damage&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RHM</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2238</link>
		<dc:creator>RHM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:26:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2238</guid>
		<description>@ GPalmer,

I&#039;ve been blogging seemingly non-stop about Palin. The cartoon is me &quot;beating a dead horse.&quot; 

Personally, I don&#039;t think the LP will EVER be relevant in a national election. They just can&#039;t ever seem to get their shit together and are unwilling to compromise an anything  - no matter how ridiculous. 

For example, the IRS and Dept. of Education are never going away. But instead of trying to reform them (or scale them down) the LP insists on completely dismantling them. Like a little kid clinging to his teddy bear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ GPalmer,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been blogging seemingly non-stop about Palin. The cartoon is me &#8220;beating a dead horse.&#8221; </p>
<p>Personally, I don&#8217;t think the LP will EVER be relevant in a national election. They just can&#8217;t ever seem to get their shit together and are unwilling to compromise an anything  &#8211; no matter how ridiculous. </p>
<p>For example, the IRS and Dept. of Education are never going away. But instead of trying to reform them (or scale them down) the LP insists on completely dismantling them. Like a little kid clinging to his teddy bear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GPalmer</title>
		<link>http://randallhmiller.com/friday-morning-fix-november-7th-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>GPalmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Nov 2008 13:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://randallhmiller.com/?p=1854#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>Randy, I don&#039;t get the cartoon... is that Todd Palin &#039;hunting&#039;?

Anyway... Who do the Republicans put up against Obama in 2012?  And, is there really any possibility of the Libertarian party being relevant?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy, I don&#8217;t get the cartoon&#8230; is that Todd Palin &#8216;hunting&#8217;?</p>
<p>Anyway&#8230; Who do the Republicans put up against Obama in 2012?  And, is there really any possibility of the Libertarian party being relevant?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
