Comments on: Is Cuba a State Sponsor of Terrorism? http://randallhmiller.com/is-cuba-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism/ Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:22:26 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: John Suarez http://randallhmiller.com/is-cuba-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-16232 John Suarez Wed, 06 Jan 2010 20:13:32 +0000 http://randallhmiller.com/?p=4917#comment-16232 Things have changed on the US side. Since 2000 the United States has sold 2.8 billion dollars and agricultural products to the Cuban regime. The Cuban dictatorship has close ties with a number of terrorist organizations FARC, the PLO, and the IRA just to name a few, & offered funding to the Macheteros a Puerto Rican terrorist group that bombed targets in the USA killing and wounding Americans and robbing a Wells Fargo armored car in 1983 stealing $7.1 million of which $2 million reached the Cuban regime via diplomatic pouch. Despite "normal" relations with Spain Cuba maintains close ties with the basque terrorist group ETA which continues to blow up targets in Spain and murder Spanish citizens. The Castro regime embraces terrorism as a legitimate tactic of Marxist-Leninist revolutionary embracing them will not change that but leave the US more exposed to terrorism. Theres a lot more information available here: http://bit.ly/5t2yOq Things have changed on the US side. Since 2000 the United States has sold 2.8 billion dollars and agricultural products to the Cuban regime. The Cuban dictatorship has close ties with a number of terrorist organizations FARC, the PLO, and the IRA just to name a few, & offered funding to the Macheteros a Puerto Rican terrorist group that bombed targets in the USA killing and wounding Americans and robbing a Wells Fargo armored car in 1983 stealing $7.1 million of which $2 million reached the Cuban regime via diplomatic pouch. Despite “normal” relations with Spain Cuba maintains close ties with the basque terrorist group ETA which continues to blow up targets in Spain and murder Spanish citizens. The Castro regime embraces terrorism as a legitimate tactic of Marxist-Leninist revolutionary embracing them will not change that but leave the US more exposed to terrorism. Theres a lot more information available here: http://bit.ly/5t2yOq

]]> By: John http://randallhmiller.com/is-cuba-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-15543 John Mon, 21 Dec 2009 22:52:04 +0000 http://randallhmiller.com/?p=4917#comment-15543 So, let me get this straight Cuba is still on the embargo because they expropiated billion of dollars of USA Businesses?. What about Venezuela? they have nationalized almost everything. Your friend's logic is flawed. The reason Cuba is still in the list, it's because the USA just doesn't care about Cuba. It is a small state with no power anymore, they can't sponsor wars in Africa or other foreign lands. So, let me get this straight Cuba is still on the embargo because they expropiated billion of dollars of USA Businesses?. What about Venezuela? they have nationalized almost everything. Your friend’s logic is flawed. The reason Cuba is still in the list, it’s because the USA just doesn’t care about Cuba. It is a small state with no power anymore, they can’t sponsor wars in Africa or other foreign lands.

]]> By: dickmill http://randallhmiller.com/is-cuba-a-state-sponsor-of-terrorism/comment-page-1/#comment-15538 dickmill Mon, 21 Dec 2009 19:49:30 +0000 http://randallhmiller.com/?p=4917#comment-15538 I understand Gomez's arguments. But, there's an opposite argument,also. We could debate ad nauseum, or we could try something different than the policy of the last few decades, which hasn't destroyed the regime or made them do as we've "ordered." So why not try another tact? If it totally bombs, is there a law that says we can't put them back on the list? I understand Gomez’s arguments. But, there’s an opposite argument,also. We could debate ad nauseum, or we could try something different than the policy of the last few decades, which hasn’t destroyed the regime or made them do as we’ve “ordered.”

So why not try another tact? If it totally bombs, is there a law that says we can’t put them back on the list?

]]>